A geomechanical assessment of the Naylor Field, Otway Basin, Australia has been undertaken to investigate the possible geomechanical effects of CO2 injection and storage. The study aims to evaluate the geomechanical behaviour of the caprock/reservoir system and to estimate the risk of fault reactivation. The stress regime in the onshore Victorian Otway Basin is inferred to be strike-slip if the maximum horizontal stress is calculated using frictional limits and DITF (drilling induced tensile fracture) occurrence, or normal if maximum horizontal stress is based on analysis of dipole sonic log data. The NW-SE maximum horizontal stress orientation (142 degrees N) determined from a resistivity image log is broadly consistent with previous estimates and confirms a NW-SE maximum horizontal stress orientation for the Otway Basin. An analytical geomechanical solution is used to describe stress changes in the subsurface of the Naylor Field. The computed reservoir stress path for the Naylor Field is then incorporated into fault reactivation analysis to estimate the minimum pore pressure increase required to cause fault reactivation (Pp) The highest reactivation propensity (for critically-oriented faults) ranges from an estimated pore pressure increase (Pp) of 1MPa to 15.7MPa (estimated pore pressure of 18.5-233. MPa) depending on assumptions made about maximum horizontal stress magnitude, fault strength,reservoir stress path and Biot's coefficient. The critical pore pressure changes for known faults at Naylor Field range from an estimated pore pressure increase (Pp) of 2MPa to 17MPa (estimated pore pressure of 19.5-34.5 MPa).

Geoscience Australia and CO2CRC have constructed a greenhouse gas controlled release reference facility to simulate surface emissions of CO2 (and other GHG gases) from an underground slotted horizontal well into the atmosphere under controlled conditions. The facility is located at an experimental agricultural station maintained by CSIRO Plant Industry at Ginninderra, Canberra. The design of the facility is modelled on the ZERT controlled release facility in Montana. The facility is equipped with a 2.5 tonne liquid CO2 storage vessel, vaporiser and mass flow controller unit with a capacity for 6 individual metered CO2 gas streams (up to 600 kg/d capacity). Injection of CO2 into soil is via a shallow (2m depth) underground 120m horizontally drilled slotted HDPE pipe. This is equipped with a packer system to partition the well into six CO2 injection chambers. The site is characterised by the presence of deep red and yellow podsolic soils with the subsoil containing mainly kaolinite and subdominant illite. Injection is above the water table. The choice of well orientation based upon the effects of various factors such as topography, wind direction, soil properties and ground water depth will be discussed. An above ground release experiment was conducted from July - October 2010 leading to the development of an atmospheric tomography technique for quantifying and locating CO2 emissions1. This technique will be applied to the first sub-surface experiment held in January-March 2012 in addition to soil flux surveys, microbiological surveys, and tracer studies. An overview of monitoring experiments conducted during the subsurface release and preliminary results will be presented. Additional CO2 releases are planned for late 2012 and 2013. Abstract for "11th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture Utilization & Sequestration" April 30 - May 3, 2012, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Geoscience Australia and the CO2CRC operate a controlled release facility in Canberra, Australia, designed for simulating subsurface emissions of CO2 by injecting gas into a horizontal well. Three controlled release experiments were conducted at this site during 2012-2013, over 7-9 week periods, to assess and develop near-surface monitoring technologies for application to carbon dioxide geological storage sites (Feitz et al., 2014). A key well-established technique for characterizing surface CO2 emission sources from controlled release sites or natural CO2 seeps is soil flux surveys. The technique is often considered as the benchmark technique for characterizing a site's emissions or as a baseline for comparing other measurement techniques, but has received less attention with regards to its absolute performance. The extensive soil gas surveys undertaken during Release 1 (Feb-May 2012) and Release 3 (Oct-Dec 2013) are the subject of this paper. Several studies have highlighted factors which can have an effect on soil flux measurements, including meteorological influences such as air pressure and wind speed, which can increase or suppress soil fluxes (Rinaldi et al. 2012). Work at the Canberra controlled release site has highlighted the influence groundwater has on the spatial distribution of fluxes.). In addition, there are several different methods available for inverting soil flux measurements to obtain the emission rate of a surveyed area. These range in complexity from planar averaging to geostatistical methods such as sequential Gaussian simulation (Lewicki et al. 2005). Each inversion technique relies on its own subset of assumptions or limitations, which can also impact the end emissions estimate. Thus deriving a realistic estimate of the total emission rate will depend on both environmental forcing as well as the applied inversion method. An in-house method for soil flux interpolation has been developed and is presented. A cubic interpolated surface is generated from all the measurement points (Figure 1), from which a background linear interpolated surface is subtracted off, leaving the net leakage flux. The background surface is prepared by identifying all background points matching a certain criteria (for this release experiment distance from release well was used) and interpolating only over those points. In these experiments, soil flux surveys were collected on a predefined grid, using an irregular sampling pattern with higher density of samples nearer to the leak hotspots to provide higher spatial resolution in the regions where flux changes most rapidly (Figure 2). The same release rate of 144 kgCO2/day was used for both experiments. It was observed that the surface flux distribution shifts markedly between experiments, most likely a function of seasonal differences (2012 was wet; 2013 was dry) and resulting differences in groundwater depth, soil saturation and the extent of the vadose zone.. The depth to the groundwater measured at monitoring wells in proximity to the release well was 0.85-1.2 m during the 2012 (wet) release whereas it ranged from 1.9-2.3 m during the 2013 (dry) release experiment. The horizontal well is located 2.0 m below the ground surface. This paper explores the performance of soil flux surveys for providing an accurate estimate of the release rate, using a series of soil flux surveys collected across both release experiments. Emission estimates are generated by applying several common inversion methods, which are then compared to the known release rate of CO2. An evaluation as to the relative suitability of different inversion methods will be provided based on their performance. Deviations from the measured release rate are also explored with respect to survey design, meteorological and groundwater factors, which can lead and inform the future deployment of soil flux surveys in a monitoring and verification program.

The Australian Government, through the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, has supported Geoscience Australia in undertaking a series of regional-scale, geological studies to assess the CO2 storage potential of sedimentary basins, including the Petrel Sub-basin. The studies form part of the National Low Emissions Coal Initiative designed to accelerate the development of CO2 transport and storage infrastructure near the sources of major energy and industrial emissions. The Petrel Sub-basin was identified as a high-priority region for a future pre-competitive work program by the national Carbon Storage Taskforce. The Carbon Storage Taskforce also recommended the release of greenhouse gas assessment permits, which were released within the Petrel Sub-basin in 2009. As a component of the studies at Geoscience Australia, the numerical simulation was hypothetically designed to dynamically model the reservoir behavior and CO2 migration during the injection and post-injection stages using an in-house built 3D geological model of a represented injection site. 14 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of CO2 was injected into the lower Frigate/Elang/Plover reservoir over 30 years and CO2 plume migration was simulated up to 2,000 years from the initial injection. The injection rate of 14 MTPA of CO2 used in this study was based on the predicted 2020 CO2 emissions of the Darwin Hub, a figure defined by the Carbon Storage Taskforce (2009). The poster highlights the simulation results including CO2 plume migration distance, CO2 trapping mechanisms and reservoir pressure behavior.

Atmospheric tomography is a monitoring technique that uses an array of sampling sites and a Bayesian inversion technique to simultaneously solve for the location and magnitude of a gaseous emission. Application of the technique to date has relied on air samples being pumped over short distances to a high precision FTIR Spectrometer, which is impractical at larger scales. We have deployed a network of cheaper, less precise sensors during three recent large scale controlled CO2 release experiments; one at the CO2CRC Ginninderra site, one at the CO2CRC Otway Site and another at the Australian Grains Free Air CO2 Enrichment (AGFACE) facility in Horsham, Victoria. The purpose of these deployments was to assess whether an array of independently powered, less precise, less accurate sensors could collect data of sufficient quality to enable application of the atmospheric tomography technique. With careful data manipulation a signal suitable for an inversion study can be seen. A signal processing workflow based on results obtained from the atmospheric array deployed at the CO2CRC Otway experiment is presented.

The economics of the storage of CO2 in underground reservoirs in Australia have been analysed as part of the Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre's GEODISC program. The analyses are based on cost estimates generated by a CO2 storage technical / economic model developed at the beginning of the GEODISC project. They also rely on data concerning the characteristics of geological reservoirs in Australia. The uncertainties involved in estimating the costs of such projects are discussed and the economics of storing CO2 for a range of CO2 sources and potential storage sites across Australia are presented. The key elements of the CO2 storage process and the methods involved in estimating the costs of CO2 storage are described and the CO2 storage costs for a hypothetical but representative storage project in Australia are derived. The effects of uncertainties inherent in estimating the costs of storing CO2 are shown. The analyses show that the costs are particularly sensitive to parameters such as the CO2 flow rate, the distance between the source and the storage site, the physical properties of the reservoir and the market prices of equipment and services. Therefore, variations in any one of these inputs can lead to significant variation in the costs of CO2 storage. Allowing for reasonable variations in all the inputs together in a Monte Carlo simulation of any particular site, then a large range of total CO2 storage costs is possible. The effect of uncertainty for the hypothetical representative storage site is illustrated. The impact of storing other gases together with CO2 is analysed. The other gases include methane, hydrogen sulphide, nitrogen, nitrous oxides and oxides of sulphur, all of which potentially could be captured together with CO2. The effect on storage costs when varying quantities of other gases are injected with the CO2 is shown. Based on the CO2 storage estimates and the published costs capturing CO2 from industrial processes, the econ

The CO2CRC Otway Project in southwestern Victoria, Australia has injected over 17 months 65 445 tonnes of a mixed carbon dioxide-methane fluid into the water leg of a depleted natural gas reservoir at a depth of approximately 2km. Pressurized sub-surface fluids were collected from the Naylor-1 observation well using a tri-level U-tube sampling system located near the crest of the fault-bounded anticline trap, 300 metres up-dip of the CRC-1 gas injection well. Relative to the pre-injection gas-water contact (GWC), only the shallowest U-tube initially accessed the residual methane gas cap. The pre-injection gas cap at Naylor-1 contains CO₂ at 1.5 mol% compared to 75.4 mol% for the injected gas from the Buttress-1 supply well and its CO₂ is depleted in ¹³C by 4.5%₀ VPDB compared to the injected supercritical CO<Sub>2</sub>. Additional assurance of the arrival of injected gas at the observation well is provided by the use of the added tracer compounds, CD₄, Kr and SF₆ in the injected gas stream. Lessons learnt from the CO2CRC Otway Project have enabled us to better anticipate the challenges for rapid deployment of carbon dioxide in a commercial environment at much larger scales.

Australia has become the first country to offer commercial offshore acreage for the purpose of storing greenhouse gases in geological formations. Ten offshore areas in five basins/sub-basins are open for applications for Assessment Permits, which will allow exploration in those areas for suitable geological formations and conditions for storage of greenhouse gases (predominantly CO2). The acreage was released on the 27th March 2009 under the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006. The acreage release is modelled on Australia's annual Offshore Petroleum Acreage Release; applicants can apply for an Assessment Permit for any of the ten areas, which is approximately equivalent to an exploration permit in petroleum terms. Applications will be assessed on a work-bid basis and other selection criteria outlined in the Regulations and Guidance Notes for Applicants. Following the assessment period, project proponents may apply for an injection license (equivalent to a production license in the petroleum industry) to inject and store greenhouse gas substances in the permit area. The areas offered in this first round of Acreage Release include five areas located within the Gippsland and Otway basins, offshore Victoria and South Australia, and the other five areas are located in the Vlaming and Petrel sub-basins, offshore Western Australia and the Northern Territory. The offshore areas offered for GHG geological storage assessment are significantly larger than their offshore petroleum counterparts to account for, and fully contain, the expected migration pathways of the injected GHG substances.

In the 2011/12 Budget, the Australian Government announced funding of a four year National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP) to accelerate the identification and development of suitable long term CO2 storage sites, within reasonable distances of major energy and industrial emission sources. The NCIP funding follows on from funding announced earlier in 2011 from the Carbon Storage Taskforce through the National Carbon Mapping and Infrastructure Plan and previous funding recommended by the former National Low Emissions Coal Council. Four offshore sedimentary basins and several onshore basins have been identified for study and pre-competitive data acquisition.

In mid 2011, the Australian Government announced funding of a new four year National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP) to accelerate the identification and development of sites suitable for the long term storage of CO2 in Australia that are within reasonable distances of major energy and industrial CO2 emission sources. The NCIP program promotes pre-competitive storage exploration and provides a basis for the development of transport and storage infrastructure. The Plan follows on from recommendations of the Carbon Storage Taskforce and the National CCS Council (formerly, the National Low Emissions Coal Council). It builds on the work funded under the National Low Emissions Coal Initiative and the need for adequate storage to be identified as a national priority. Geoscience Australia is providing strategic advice in delivering the plan and will lead in the acquisition of pre-competitive data and geological studies to assess storage potential. Four offshore sedimentary basins (Bonaparte, Browse, Perth and Gippsland basins) and several onshore basins have been identified for pre-competitive data acquisition and study.